登录  
 加关注
查看详情
   显示下一条  |  关闭
温馨提示!由于新浪微博认证机制调整,您的新浪微博帐号绑定已过期,请重新绑定!立即重新绑定新浪微博》  |  关闭

创建

CREATION, CONSTRUCTION

 
 
 

日志

 
 
关于我

。中英文交流。爱好艺术。

Unmeaningful arguments and persistence  

2010-03-06 22:31:25|  分类: 默认分类 |  标签: |举报 |字号 订阅

  下载LOFTER 我的照片书  |
      

Copenhagen Conference has been at the end of it. On the conference there were very intense arguments. American delegates insisted on refusing aids to developing countries. Chinese delegates persisted in getting the financial support from developed countries. So the arguments appeared. Then the arguments were unmeaningful. The old industrialized way from West means producing greenhouse air and pollutants.  We have to make efforts reduce and eliminate them. Replacing another sentence; if we choose the West industrialized way, we must consider to prepare to reduce emission and to eliminate pollutants. Further more Chinese premier Wen has promised to accept such projects. It should be a social responsibility for industrialization. Chinese government has chosen the industrialized way. Chinese people have the responsibility to reduce emission. It is not relating to whether getting aids or not. Of course American delegates should not persist in own idea for no aiding any developing countries, because America has a long history of harmful emission. So neither persistence nor argument are meaningful.

  No argument! Do any thing should do!

  评论这张
 
阅读(113)| 评论(0)

历史上的今天

评论

<#--最新日志,群博日志--> <#--推荐日志--> <#--引用记录--> <#--博主推荐--> <#--随机阅读--> <#--首页推荐--> <#--历史上的今天--> <#--被推荐日志--> <#--上一篇,下一篇--> <#-- 热度 --> <#-- 网易新闻广告 --> <#--右边模块结构--> <#--评论模块结构--> <#--引用模块结构--> <#--博主发起的投票-->
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

页脚

网易公司版权所有 ©1997-2018